This is a story about how two official assessments of the same person, using the same medical records, ten weeks apart, reached opposite conclusions. I'm sharing it because it says something about how the system works, not just for me, but for anyone who's been through something similar.

The First Assessment

I applied for recognition of my situation through the official process. The agency sent me to a specialist for a 25-minute appointment. She noted that I spoke well, seemed calm, and appeared to be managing. Her conclusion was that my situation wasn't severe enough to meet the threshold. One of the reasons: treatment options hadn't been exhausted yet.

The Second Assessment

Ten weeks later, a different agency assessed me for a different kind of support. A different doctor, but the same medical records, the same hospital files that had documented my treatment history over the past decade.

This time, the findings were different. Concentration was noted as reduced. Energy and motivation were noted as reduced. The hospital records she cited stated explicitly that treatment options had been exhausted. She concluded that I needed significant ongoing support, and that this need would very likely not go away.

The Gap

Two assessments of the same person, from the same medical history. One says I manage well enough. The other says I need ongoing care and will keep needing it. Both documents are official, and both are valid today.

I don't know how to reconcile that. I don't think the system knows either.

The Bigger Picture

My residency application was also affected. The immigration authority looked at my university record and asked: if you could study, why can't you work? They acknowledged that my situation involves significant limitations (their words) but used my academic effort as evidence that those limitations shouldn't prevent employment.

One office found me doing too well to need support, another found me not well enough to carry myself. The university could not accommodate what I needed, and employers did not answer hundreds of applications.

Each office follows its own logic. Put next to each other, they contradict each other.

Why I'm Sharing This

I'm not writing this to complain about one person or one decision. I write it because falling between systems happens to many people: every office sees a different part of you, and nobody sees the whole person. Most people cannot show it on paper afterwards.

I can, because it is all documented. That is why it belongs on the record.

← Back to all posts